2915

The original Speedmaster, first produced in 1957.

Authors note: I have seen more now, than when I first wrote this site, and this page is updated (December 2016). I will reiterate that 2915’s are a minefield of counterfeit parts and put together watches. Be careful, and do due diligence.

Here is an example of a 2915-1 and 2915-2. The only difference is the number in the case back:

1-P1290084
L to R. 2915-1 and 2915-2

And here is the two examples (known as executions) of the 2915-3:

P3020003-006
Two executions of the 2915-3. The broad arrow hands and silver bezel on the earlier watch on the right, while the later watch on the left has the BASE1000 bezel seen on the 2998-1 & 2. The Alpha hands are different to those fitted to the 2998’s as the hour is longer. The brown dial is one of the most attractive I have ever seen.

Produced in four executions, over three references, the production dates are very hard to pin down, and the movement numbers and specifications I observe make it hard to be definitive on originality.

Serial Numbers

Debates come and go regarding serial numbers, and so I must go with my own observations, and rely on statistical weight. So far I feel that numbers ought to be as follows:

2915-1 and 2915-2 :  1599xxxx or 1550xxxx

2915-3 : 1664xxxx

For now, I would be very suspicious of watches carrying other serial ranges, because when I see a watch outside these parameters,  there is almost always a question mark over it for some reason – perhaps other non original parts, or dubious history that make me doubt it is an original movement.

Bezels

The original steel bezels are often missing – Omega offer a service replacement bezel, but it looks quite wrong as it is too wide and the font is different (see below). The cross section is also different.

There are reproductions of various quality, some of which are almost (for me totally) impossible to spot as repro. This is because I have small experience handling bezels I know to be genuine. They are so rare, and impossible to truly authenticate. As a result, if the watch carries a bezel that looks right, I accept it. In other words if the bezel is steel, carries the correct profile, is not a cut down modern bezel, and has commensurate wear to the case I will think that it might fit the watch.

What I DO NOT do, is pay $10,000+ for a bezel that someone says is original, nor do I place that value in the watch. I do, it has to be said, allow myself to be swayed if the bezel looks right AND the rest of the watch has no other questionable characteristics. It is my opinion that 2915 bezels might have been engraved by hand originally and so we might expect minor variations. These bezels are very hard to replicate. Many have tried. Those who succeed seem to sell them for about $1000-1500 and as of today I have been unable to find out how they do it – so we could argue they earn their money.

We have also to be careful of watches built up using seamaster movements. Its not hard to find a seamaster with a 15m serial. Thankfully they are starting to be appreciated for their own charms, and so are being priced out of the scrappers price range.

There have been two cases on the market recently, at least one of which was an outright fake. The others no doubt will be built up using non original parts. Because so few are seen, it will be very hard for anyone to authenticate.

Hands

Here is a 2915-3 with correct Alpha hands (note the length of the hour hand) and a modern Omega bezel. This execution should have the black BASE1000 bezel if fitted with Alpha hands – we think! These alpha hands are very rare indeed, and differ from the 2998 alphas by having a slightly longer hour hand, you can see it is closer to the end of the dial plot.

2915-3 with modern silver bezel, and alpha hands
2915-3 with modern silver bezel, and alpha hands. Note the length of the hour hand is longer than those on the 2998 series.

Here are some broad arrow hands. On the left are vintage service replacements and on the right original vintage (either original or service). There are other modern ones on the market but they have different shape lume. Over the years many sets seem to have been manufactured, and so even those below on the right may well be old service items. It is a minefield.

1-P3020003
2915 hands

Subdial hands are all leaf, and I see them unpainted. Of course over years these get painted.

I have seen a lollipop on a 2915-3, and I am certain this was added after it left the factory – because I have never seen it on another example and I believe lollipops were only fitted to the middle production of the 2998.

Dials

The heart of the value of this watch. Radium lume, it often shows degradation of the type shown in the photos on this page. While there are a few variations of correct 2915 dials, I am not familiar enough to truly be able discern them – and for me it does not really matter as long as they have the short indices on the subdials.

If a watch is missing a dial, or carries an incorrect dial, it is hard to overestimate the reduction in value you must make to the price in the chart. I have seen a 2915 dial sell for over $20,000 and some might say that was cheap. It seems absurd, until you do the calculations.

2915-1

The first, and most sought after Speedmaster of all. Very hard to find in original condition. The last one that was thought to be original sold in Christies for around $70,000 several years ago. Then in December 2015 Christies sold a 2915-1 with a reworked case sold for $120,000 – but I doubt it was to a knowledgeable Speedmaster collector. There is a service bezel with a different font and profile that we fit:

2915. Hands and Bezel are service replacements
2915.
Hands and Bezel are service replacements. Dial is original, note the short indices. This is a “flat O” version. For more details on 2915 dials I point you to the MWO book.

Here is the same watch, after replacing the hands and bezel:

PC070003-001
2915-1 after sympathetic service and replacement of service hands and bezel. This restoration took me over three years to find the correct parts. Note also the dial degradation near the AML.

The case back is engraved “Speedmaster” at the edge on the bevel.

P3020010-002
Note the engraving on the step. This example has no Hippocampus on the rear.

Calibre 321

Serial Range: 1544xxx or 1550xxxx have been observed in multiple examples. While other serials might be original we cannot be sure and Omega does not issue extracts for these.

Dial

  • Domed
  • Radium lume,
  • applied metal logo
  • No Professional text
  • SWISS MADE
  • Short indices on subdials

Case

  • Straight lugs, 19mm
  • Caseback- double step with speedmaster engraved on step. Some without Hippocampus

Hands

  • Hour/minute – broad arrow
  • Subdial – leaf, unpainted
  • Chrono – straight, unpainted

Pushers

  • 4 x 3mm

Crown

  • 7mm

Bezel

  • SilverBASE1000 bezel

2915-2

Identical to the -1 as far as I can see. Even the serial number ranges are the same, in observed watches.

P3020004-005

 A further example can be seen here

2915-3

This came in two versions, one with the same appearance as the previous, with a silver bezel and broad arrow hands. The second with alpha hands and a black BASE1000 bezel. The alpha hour hand is slightly longer than the 2998-1 that follows. Also the engraving on the back changed so that the Speedmaster text was closer to the Hippocampus.

P3020003-006
2915-3’s. The Brown on the right is extremely valuable

Calibre 321

Serial Range: All confirmed original watches I have seen have fallen in the 1664xxxx range.

Dial

  • Domed
  • Radium lume
  • applied metal logo
  • No Professional text
  • SWISS MADE
  • Short indices on subdials

Case

  • Straight lugs, 19mm
  • Caseback- double step with speedmaster engraved on rear

Hands

  • Hour/minute – alpha or broad arrow. Note the hour alpha is longer than the one fitted to the 2998.
  • Subdial – leaf, unpainted
  • Chrono – straight, unpainted

Pushers

  • 4 x 3mm

Crown

  • 7mm

Bezel

  • Silver bezel when with broad arrow hands
  • Black BASE1000 bezel with dot over 90 (DO90) when seen with alpha hands.

The above “rules” regarding bezel and had combinations are quite possibly entirely wrong – it just makes sense to me, and fits observations – but there is no solid evidence to reject the other combinations as non original – just it seems to make more sense.

Now we can go on to the 2998